Watchmen *SPOILERS*


Missy

Recommended Posts

*shrugs*

The only real spoiler I've heard is that

the squid monster won't be in it

. And to some degree with adaptations, I've just learned to lower my expectations, because there's no way they're going to get it perfect, ever.

Just so long as he doesn't start adding things like he did in 300, I think he'll do a decent job.

Besides, compared to the previous drafts I've seen of this, this isn't so horrible.

I understand what you're saying, though.

The general consensus is that most people loved 300, so adding stuff didn't hurt it.

I do not have high hopes for this movie. I don't like Snyder's previous movies, and some of the leaked spoilers really bugged the hell out of me.

You will never get a direct translation of a comic book. It's just not possible. This movie is going to be really good. I've heard nothing but praise from anyone who has seen footage from it. I don't understand why anyone would hate on it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 472
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

The general consensus is that most people loved 300, so adding stuff didn't hurt it.

Most people I knew thought that the cuts back to Sparta (the stuff Snyder added in to pad the film) were the weakest parts of the entire movie, myself included. But those were still halfway decent, so who knows.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You will never get a direct translation of a comic book. It's just not possible. This movie is going to be really good. I've heard nothing but praise from anyone who has seen footage from it. I don't understand why anyone would hate on it.

I don't want a direct translation. I loved Dark Knight and Joker and Two Face are very different in a lot of ways there. I'm just saying that I don't like what Snyder changed in particular. There are changes I would be find with. What was changed wasn't one of them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The general consensus is that most people loved 300, so adding stuff didn't hurt it.

Most people I knew thought that the cuts back to Sparta (the stuff Snyder added in to pad the film) were the weakest parts of the entire movie, myself included. But those were still halfway decent, so who knows.

Yeah, the whole traitor subplot didn't hold up with the rest of the film. I think most people would agree with that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is it bad that I am kinda rooting for Fox to stop the release?

Unless the subject matter has the potential to be particularly offensive, the best way of not supporting something is ignoring it. So if you don't want to support the Watchmen film adaptation, save your money and stay at home. Granted, that's a rich statement from the Earth-2 forums which helps the Saw franchise by going to see the films that it then verbally tears down in various reviews, but at least that franchise is running out of steam. Was it mentioned that Saw V was beaten at the box office by Zac Efron singing and dancing?

Stopping the release denies the movie being watched by those who really are interested, and would be monumentally stupid on Fox's part when they can make money out of the film if WB doesn't win some kind of appeal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They still have a release date on it, which I very much appreciate.

I'm kind of surprised at the slight spoilers that are in here, especially w/r/t Adrian. But then, I think that they're assuming that it's people who have already read the whole of Watchmen that are watching this.

Also, JDM as the Comedian? FUCK. YES.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Los Angeles Times says that lawyers for 20th Century Fox and Warner Bros. have agreed to let a federal judge decide whether Warner Bros. will be allowed to release Watchmen on March 6, forgoing a jury trial that could have put the high-profile film's future into even longer limbo.

http://www.comingsoon.net/news/movienews.php?id=51757

Link to comment
Share on other sites

From one of the producers of the movie:

"Watchmen. A producer's perspective.

An open letter.

Who is right? In the Watchmen dispute between Warner Brothers and Fox that question is being discussed, analyzed, argued, tried and ruled on in a court of law. That's one way to answer the question - It is a fallback position in our society for parties in conflict to resolve disputes. And there are teams of lawyers and a highly regarded Federal Judge trying to do just that, which obviates any contribution I could make towards answering the "who is right" question within a legal context. But after 15 plus years of involvement in the project, and a decade more than that working in the movie business, I have another perspective, a personal perspective that I believe important to have on the public record.

No one is more keenly aware of the irony of this dispute than Larry Gordon and I who have been trying to get this movie made for many years. There's a list of people who have rejected the viability of a movie based on Alan Moore and Dave Gibbon's classic graphic novel that reads like a who's who of Hollywood.

We've been told the graphic novel is unfilmable.

After 9/11 some felt the story's themes were too close to reality ever to be palatable to a mainstream audience.

There were those who considered the project but who wished it were somehow different: Could it be a buddy movie, or a team-up movie or could it focus on one main character; did it have to be so dark; did so many people have to die; could it be stripped of its flashback structure; could storylines be eliminated; could new storylines be invented; did it have to be so long; could the blue guy put clothes on... The list of dissatisfactions for what Watchmen is was as endless as the list of suggestions to make it something it never was.

Also endless are the list of studio rejections we accrued over the years. Larry and I developed screenplays at five different studios. We had two false starts in production on the movie. We were involved with prominent and commercial directors. Big name stars were interested. In one instance hundreds of people were employed, sets were being built - An A-list director and top artists in the industry were given their walking papers when the studio financing the movie lost faith.

After all these years of rejection, this is the same project, the same movie, over which two studios are now spending millions of dollars contesting ownership. Irony indeed, and then some.

Through the years, inverse of the lack of studio faith has been the passionate belief by many many individuals - movie professionals who were also passionate fans of the graphic novel - who, yes, wanted to work on the film, but more for reasons of just wanting to see the movie get made, to see this movie get made and made right, donated their time and talent to help push the film forward: Writers gave us free screenplay drafts; conceptual art was supplied by illustrators, tests were performed gratis by highly respected actors and helped along and put together by editors, designers, prop makers and vfx artists; we were the recipients of donated studio and work space, lighting and camera equipment. Another irony, given the commercial stakes implied by the pitched legal dispute between Fox and Warners, is that for years Watchmen has been a project that has survived on the fumes of whatever could be begged, borrowed and stolen - A charity case for all intents and purposes. None of that effort, none of that passion and emotional involvement, is considered in the framework of this legal dispute.

From my point of view, the flashpoint of this dispute, came in late spring of 2005. Both Fox and Warner Brothers were offered the chance to make Watchmen. They were submitted the same package, at the same time. It included a cover letter describing the project and its history, budget information, a screenplay, the graphic novel, and it made mention that a top director was involved.

And it's at this point, where the response from both parties could not have been more radically different.

The response we got from Fox was a flat "pass." That's it. An internal Fox email documents that executives there felt the script was one of the most unintelligible pieces of shit they had read in years. Conversely, Warner Brothers called us after having read the script and said they were interested in the movie - yes, they were unsure of the screenplay, and had many questions, but wanted to set a meeting to discuss the project, which they promptly did. Did anyone at Fox ask to meet on the movie? No. Did anyone at Fox express any interest in the movie? No. Express even the slightest interest in the movie? Or the graphic novel? No.

From there, the executives at Warner Brothers, who weren't yet completely comfortable with the movie, made a deal to acquire the movie rights and we all started to creatively explore the possibility of making Watchmen. We discussed creative approaches and started offering the movie to directors, our former director having moved on by then. After a few director submissions, Zack Snyder came onboard, well before the release of his movie 300. In fact, well before its completion. This was a gut, creative call by Larry, me and the studio... Zack didn't have a huge commercial track record, yet we all felt he was the right guy for the movie.

Warner Brothers continued to support, both financially and creatively, the development of the movie. And eventually, after over a year of work, they agreed to make the film, based on a script that, for what it's worth, was by and large very similar to the one Fox initially read and deemed an unintelligible piece of shit.

Now here's the part that has to be fully appreciated, if for nothing more than providing insight into producing movies in Hollywood: The Watchmen script was way above the norm in length, near 150 pages, meaning the film could clock in at close to 3 hours, the movie would not only be R rated but a hard R - for graphic violence and explicit sex - would feature no stars, and had a budget north of $100M. We also asked Warner Brothers to support an additional 1 to 1.5 hours of content incurring additional cost that would tie in with the movie but only be featured in DVD iterations of the film. Warners supported the whole package and I cannot begin to emphasize how ballsy and unprecedented a move this was on the part of a major Hollywood studio. Unheard of. And would another studio in Hollywood, let alone a studio that didn't show one shred of interest in the movie, not one, have taken such a risk? Would they ever have made such a commitment, a commitment to a film that defied all conventional wisdom?

Only the executives at Fox can answer that question. But if they were to be honest, their answer would have to be "No."

Shouldn't Warner Brothers be entitled to the spoils - if any -- of the risk they took in supporting and making Watchmen? Should Fox have any claim on something they could have had but chose to neither support nor show any interest in?

Look at it another way... One reason the movie was made was because Warner Brothers spent the time, effort and money to engage with and develop the project. If Watchmen was at Fox the decision to make the movie would never have been made because there was no interest in moving forward with the project.

Does a film studio have the right to stand in the way of an artistic endeavor and determine that it shouldn't exist? If the project had been sequestered at Fox, if Fox had any say in the matter, Watchmen simply wouldn't exist today, and there would be no film for Fox to lay claim on. It seems beyond cynical for the studio to claim ownership at this point.

By his own admission, Judge Feess is faced with an extremely complex legal case, with a contradictory contractual history, making it difficult to ascertain what is legally right. Are there circumstances here that are more meaningful, which shed light on what is ultimately just, to be taken into account when assessing who is right? In this case, what is morally right, beyond the minutiae of decades-old contractual semantics, seems clear cut.

For the sake of the artists involved, for the hundreds of people, executives and filmmakers, actors and crew, who invested their time, their money, and dedicated a good portion of their lives in order to bring this extraordinary project to life, the question of what is right is clear and unambiguous - Fox should stand down with its claim.

My father, who was a lawyer and a stickler for the minutiae of the law, was always quick to teach me that the determination of what is right and wrong was not the sole purview of the courts. I bet someone at Fox had a parent like mine who instilled the same sense of fairness and justice in them.

Lloyd Levin"

http://www.hitfix.com/blogs/2008-12-6-moti...chmen-producers

Link to comment
Share on other sites

More stuff popped up overnight.

http://www.totalfilm.com/news/exclusive-watchmen-images <-- More Watchmen images, heavily featuring some of the book's best scenes with the Comedian.

And probably the biggest thing:

http://www.thenewfrontiersman.net/ <-- Exactly what it looks like. It's a viral site for The New Frontiersman. As of this time, there's nothing on the site yet, but I'd expect more soon.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.