Randomness


Missy

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 10.3k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

I've been wondering something.

Let's say you're Cable. You're protecting this baby whilst on the run and constantly getting into gunfights.

Where would you put the baby?

A backpack seems like a no-go. Having an infant strapped to your back where you can't see it (especially while running) is a terrible idea.

Would you just hold the baby in one arm? That doesn't seem like the greatest idea either.

The whole babychest thing looks a bit ridiculous at first glance, but I kind of think that it's probably the most logical choice given the situation. Cable can use his arms (especially his giant metal one) to protect the baby, he can see her at all times (as well as any threats that she might be [literally] facing), and both his arms are free to do whatever they need to. It's still not a great idea, but bringing a baby into life-threatening situations is a bad idea in general.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've been wondering something.

Let's say you're Cable. You're protecting this baby whilst on the run and constantly getting into gunfights.

Where would you put the baby?

A backpack seems like a no-go. Having an infant strapped to your back where you can't see it (especially while running) is a terrible idea.

Would you just hold the baby in one arm? That doesn't seem like the greatest idea either.

The whole babychest thing looks a bit ridiculous at first glance, but I kind of think that it's probably the most logical choice given the situation. Cable can use his arms (especially his giant metal one) to protect the baby, he can see her at all times (as well as any threats that she might be [literally] facing), and both his arms are free to do whatever they need to. It's still not a great idea, but bringing a baby into life-threatening situations is a bad idea in general.

Backpack, shoulder, futuristic forcefield since they can make up the rules anyway; there are a million better ways to do it. Baby on the chest completely unarmored is #9778 on list of best ideas.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Eh. Not counting adding additional armor/forcefields/whatever, I still think it's better than any other position. Not by a lot, but by a little. Otherwise he has literally no way of protecting her unless he's going to run backwards from every threat and constantly check over his shoulder to make sure she hasn't been shot or had her neck snapped while he wasn't looking.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.