Recommended Posts

  • Replies 942
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

If she was signed to a three-picture deal, then Justice League would have fulfilled it.

Also, even if she can't actually drop out, by doing this, WB needs to either A) publicly get rid of Ratner, or B) explain very, very carefully why they aren't getting rid of Ratner.

Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, JackFetch said:

It's hard for me to believe she isn't bound by her contract to do the sequel no matter what. Remember when Natalie Portman wanted to get out of Thor 2 but couldn't because of her contract? 

Story is she signed a three movie deal. BvS, Wonder Woman, and Justice League makes 3.

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 3 weeks later...
  • 1 month later...

It's done by the guys who're doing Gotham.

Meaning it'll be a Superman show with Brainiac and Parasite and Toyman and Zod and the Eradicator and all your favorite villains, but without Superman.

It will suck.

I actually wouldn't mind the premise of the show, but not from these guys.

Link to post
Share on other sites
On 1/30/2018 at 1:55 PM, dc20willsave said:

 

Warner Bros continued insistence in doing Superman things without Superman in it is something not to love

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 2 months later...
  • 1 month later...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.