Johnny MC

I would say i'm more of a casual player when it comes to RPGs, but I think VII was my favorite. However, I did enjoy the upgrading system (with the grids) in X the most, as I thought it was the easiest to use. I ended up getting all the circles for Wakka and Tidus. The only other one I own is X-2 and that dress business just started to piss me off.

I just finished beating Rise of the Imperfects. I don't think it has much replay value, and it didn't take too long to beat. So I would say give it a rental. It's pretty fun, especially if you have someone to play it with. Once you get good with the movements, battles between two fast characters get pretty intense. Daredevil vs. Spider-Man was amazing between my friend and I.

I thought that Batman: Hush was good. I have the Trade Paperbacks of both volumes. The artwork in there is very brutal in some frames, especially ones involving Batman and Joker. (Spoiler? Not really, I guess.) It really is phenominal artwork. The story is also very interesting, but it seems a bit linear in some points. HOWEVER. If you were looking for Jeph Loeb's best work in Batman, I would have to hand that over to either Dark Victory or The Long Holloween.

I still think X-Men 3 will be "ok". It will be the summer blockbuster that scrapes in all the money for Fox.

I don't remember there being that many sexual referrences in the forefront of Rush Hour 1, Rush Hour 2, or Red Dragon.

I thought the dialogue was overall pretty cheesy, and there was a lack of action. It was a humorous fun movie and I was moderately entertained, which is why I would give it a 6/10.

Devil May Cry 3 is worthy of a rental, I must say. Far superior to 2, in my opinion.

That's a lie and you know, young man! You know you've personally killed sixteen of your classmates in the last week. Admit it! And blame GTA... do it! Or I'll admit it for you! I honestly hate it when people blame video games to violent behavior. Maybe if these parents actually knew what they were doing in raising their kids and perhaps raised them in a loving environment they would not go off and snap on people. This game will probably sell millions of copies and it'll be a handful of kids that actually go out and try it. The ones that were much more screwed up before they even got their hands on the game.

I really think that it's more of a parenting problem than a media problem. I'm going to be a serious advocate that kids are smarter than people give them. Myself at 18 years old, my dad never really shielded me from anything. I saw Natural Born Killers at a young age, as well as all the Tarentino movies. I own all the Grand Theft Auto games, and never ever ever once have I ever given a thought towards actually killing someone.

X-Men Legends is an awesome game if you and three friends have a lot of time on your hands. Simply awesome. On the PS2, I would suggest playing God of War. Awesome game, and it took probably around 10-11 hours to beat. Gran Turismo 4 is, in my opinion, worth the 50 bucks it took to get it.

Definately Darth Vader, however it would be an awesome battle of the bad asses.

Some games play out like a game. I think Max Payne should be the best bet for a successful transition.

Topher Grace casted in Spider-man 3! Hrm. Says to be surprised as whom he is casted as.

3 of which are substandard. Right, and he strayed from the source in Forever, as well. He is le fuckup when it comes to Batman movies.

Yes, Uma Thurman, George Clooney, Alicia Silverstone and Arnold Schwartzenegger. All actors with big screen names. and Joel Schumacher. A screen veteran who directed the new Phantom of the Opera, Veronica Guerin, Phone Booth, The Lost Boys, and St. Elmo's Fire... ...as well as having experience in the batman franchise with Forever.

I really don't know about that either though. It is seen that a title can be ruined. For example, I don't really know too many non-comic book readers that are excited about seeing Batman Begins, let alone think it's not going to suck horribly. Where as X-Men 3, even were it bad, would still draw on it's name.

To be honest, I think i'd much rather be on the X-Men 3 boat, which is almost guaranteed to do amazing financially, to a Superman movie that is a question mark when it comes to the average movie-goer.

I really don't think that any exercise, or study, could possibly help you when dodging something thrown by a person who never misses. It's not really reflex, it's more instinct to move when something is thrown, and agility depending on where the object is thrown into you. Batman however, is normal. He could possibly be as well honed as a human could be, but frankly, he has no superpowers. Average people can punch him. I agree with Master Yoda, I think it's ludacris to think that Batman should have defeated Bullseye.

I honestly don't know what the facination with Batman is. Like, I think he's a cool well built character and all, but the guy really doesn't have any powers. It's rediculous to think that a simple vigilante with some gadgets could outdo a superpowered villain of any sort, even with the best training.

Haha. Sorry, I guess I wasn't clear. I meant his powers weren't entirely based off his genetics, not that he was only half a mutant.

Wasn't there recently a Playboy involving video game characters like Bloodrayne naked or something? Seems kind of lame in my opinion, but, yay for girls.

Yeah, I wouldn't say he's ENTIRELY mutant. There is a possibility that he may have mutant abilities, but still, he's not wholy a mutant. If that makes sense. Or even develops any arguement at all.

I really think there are too many outside elements to throwing something and never missing to having it be an entirely genetical power.

I think they'd be better off going to some unknown who has a decent look and can keep the ball rolling with his acting for the role of Venom. Whoever plays him though will certainly get a huge career boost.

Brock could barely act while he was wrestling, let alone given a major role in a super budget film.