Aaron Robinson Posted March 7, 2010 Report Share Posted March 7, 2010 I wasn't planning on seeing this, but I ended up going with some friends last night. I was surprised by how much I enjoyed it. I haven't really enjoyed a Burton film in a long time, but I had fun with this one. I kept hearing about how bad the special effects were, but I didn't think they were that bad really. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KnightWing Posted March 7, 2010 Report Share Posted March 7, 2010 Did anyone see the TRON trailer that was supposedly attached to the 3D version of the movie? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dc20willsave Posted March 7, 2010 Report Share Posted March 7, 2010 Did anyone see the TRON trailer that was supposedly attached to the 3D version of the movie? I did. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KnightWing Posted March 7, 2010 Report Share Posted March 7, 2010 Did anyone see the TRON trailer that was supposedly attached to the 3D version of the movie? I did. =D Was it awesome? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dc20willsave Posted March 7, 2010 Report Share Posted March 7, 2010 Did anyone see the TRON trailer that was supposedly attached to the 3D version of the movie? I did. =D Was it awesome? It was eye porn if I've ever seen it. Definitely the movie that will make this 3-D fad worth it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Molly Posted March 7, 2010 Report Share Posted March 7, 2010 [quote name='Preston Nelson' date='06 March 2010 - 07:17 PM' timestamp='1267920995' post='89336' I have no faith in Tim Burton, at all. But then he made the exact movie that everyone expected him to and now you're "sickened"? Give me a break. You know what Big Fish, Beetlejuice and Edward Scissorhands have in common? They're all a decade old. Burton has done nothing in ten years to prove himself to me. He's creatively bankrupt, and CGI is only hurting his cause. He's pretty much an artier George Lucas. This film was just Spielberg's 'Hook' with gratuitous CGI. I'm not blaming anyone for liking it, I just hated it. The more I marinate on it, the less I outright hate everything about it. The Hatter works for me the more I think about it, I'll admit. Which, considering my usual feelings for Mr. Depp, is incredible. The film is low on my list, I'll admit, but it's not entirely without merit. I just think seeing a guy like Burton, a talented guy, make an average, run of the mill popcorn flick is enraging. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SuaveStar Posted March 8, 2010 Report Share Posted March 8, 2010 NEW YORK - Tim Burton and Johnny Depp's trip down the rabbit hole drew huge crowds, as "Alice in Wonderland" earned a whopping $116.3 million in its opening weekend a record for a 3-D film. The surprisingly huge total easily surpassed all other films in release and gave Walt Disney Studios an even bigger opening than that of the hugely popular 3-D film "Avatar." It also marked the biggest opening weekend for a non-sequel. "This is just one of those cultural phenomenons that has caught everybody's interest," said Chuck Viane, Disney's president of distribution. "They don't come like this very often." The film beat forecasts that ranged between $65-$75 million, and the surprising results added some intrigue to Oscar Sunday. Before the weekend, Disney and 20th Century Fox competed over the available 3-D ready screens; screens outfitted for 3-D are rapidly rising, but still amount to fewer than 4,000 in the U.S. and Canada. Before "Alice," many of those screens were still dedicated to Fox's box-office behemoth, "Avatar," which is up for nine Academy Awards on Sunday, including best picture. In its 12th week of release, "Avatar" earned $7.7 million over the weekend, bringing its cumulative domestic total to $720.2 million. Asked whether fewer 3-D and IMAX screens hurt "Avatar," Chris Aronson, head of distribution for Fox, said, "No question." "Are we disappointed? Sure," said Aronson. "But there are certain market forces that are beyond anything we can do. To have an 11-week window is pretty much unheard of. It certainly allowed this movie to be discovered and witnessed by so many people." "Avatar" isn't disappearing, though, and it can be expected to regain 3-D and IMAX screens, especially if it wins best picture. "We'll have that negotiation tomorrow morning with exhibition, without a doubt," said Aronson. It also seemed likely that "Alice" benefited from the "Avatar"-effect in galvanizing audiences for 3-D movies. "Alice in Wonderland" is the first film released in 3-D since James Cameron's epic. "Alice" was shot in 2-D, but transferred to 3-D in post-production. "In the wake of the impact of 'Avatar,' there's a whole new audience that's been indoctrinated to 3-D," said Paul Dergarabedian, box-office analyst for Hollywood.com. "That paid off big for 'Alice in Wonderland.'" The weekend's second best performer at the box-office was Overture's "Brooklyn's Finest," Antoine Fuqua's gritty police thriller, which earned $13.5 million in its first weekend, according to studio estimates. Martin Scorsese's "Shutter Island" for Paramount followed closely with $13.3 million in its third week of release, bringing its cumulative total to $95.8 million. Warner Bros.'s comedy "Cop Out" came in fourth, adding $9.1 million for a two-week total of $32.4 million. But "Alice" thoroughly dominated the weekend, surprising even Disney. The film was expected to open closer to $65-75 million. Worldwide, it took in $210.3 million. It was a record release for the first quarter of the year, typically a time of lower box-office expectations and critically acclaimed Oscar contenders. The previous first quarter record was Mel Gibson's "Passion of the Christ," which opened with $83.8 million in Feb. 2004. "We went into Friday thinking that we really had a big hit with us, and then all of a sudden the numbers started to roll in," said Viane. "Alice" went on to make $41 million on Friday alone. "We said, 'Oh my gosh. This is bigger than any of us could have anticipated," said Viane. Though reviews were mostly respectfully negative, much of the film's draw was surely in teaming director Burton and his frequent collaborator, Depp, who plays the Mad Hatter. It also presented moviegoers with a 3-D updating of Lewis Carroll's beloved classic. Though at times dark, it gained a PG rating from the MPAA (for, among other things, "a smoking caterpillar"), which meant a large number of kids could attend. But it proved once again how significant the draw of 3-D is to moviegoers. The technology repeatedly has inflated box-office grosses for everything from "Avatar" to "Cloudy with a Chance of Meatballs." "Alice" also played across 188 IMAX screens in North America and gave IMAX its best opening ever, with $11.9 million domestically. That beat the previous record of $9.5 million set by "Avatar." IMAX chairman and president Greg Foster said the huge success of "Alice" was unexpected, but that "Avatar" would regain some of those IMAX screens, whether or not it wins best picture. "The momentum on 3-D is so massive right now," said Foster. "They were ready for a new movie. They were ready for a new, cool 3-D experience." Though most of the Oscar contenders weren't a big factor at the box-office Sunday, the boffo performance of "Alice" proved the good health of Hollywood, said Dergarabedian. Source Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KnightWing Posted March 8, 2010 Report Share Posted March 8, 2010 Saw it today. VERY underwhelmed. Though it wasn't at all helped by the fact that I specifically went so I could see the 3D TRON trailer, and didn't see it. - _ - Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Missy Posted March 8, 2010 Report Share Posted March 8, 2010 Was I the only one who thought of Fin Fang Foom when the Jabberwocky showed up? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Molly Posted March 9, 2010 Report Share Posted March 9, 2010 Was I the only one who thought of Fin Fang Foom when the Jabberwocky showed up? No, you were not. I was just waiting for him to put Alice in his pants and then sorely regret it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KnightWing Posted March 9, 2010 Report Share Posted March 9, 2010 Was I the only one who thought of Fin Fang Foom when the Jabberwocky showed up? No, you were not. Ditto. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Missy Posted March 9, 2010 Report Share Posted March 9, 2010 Now I want a Nextwave movie featuring Fin Fang Foom. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Koete Posted March 9, 2010 Report Share Posted March 9, 2010 Was I the only one who thought of Fin Fang Foom when the Jabberwocky showed up? That would explain Stan Lee's recent statements that he created the Jabberwock... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MaxPower Posted March 16, 2010 Report Share Posted March 16, 2010 I'm going to see Lewis Black. Bastard, I'd love to see him live..... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.