slothian

Super Moderator
  • Posts

    5,891
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by slothian

  1. Yeah, I think "mediocre" sums up the first X-Men film pretty nicely. It was about what I expected at the time, nothing exceptional. X-2 hit it out of the park.

    Basically. I still refuse to call the first film mediocre, although I accept that it's a matter of personal preference. Personally, I was very fond of the first film. Then again, I am hopelessly infatuated with Anna Paquin, who had a substantial role in the first film. :wub:

  2. I want Storm(and Berry's ego) out of all future movies. She's useless and boring. She has no story in the movies, she's just there. I think every other mutant had a story going on except her.

    Y'see, I think she's needed for continuity now. Xavier basically handed control of the institute to her so she's going to be there if the film is once more going to be based from the Academy. That stops her being useless, if not boring perhaps, and gives her a story if they play out the ending from after the credits.

  3. Here's a turn up for the books:

    Halle Berry Calls Out to X-Men Fans

    Source: Superhero Hype! January 11, 2007

    We received a lot of mail from fans about this one (sorry folks, we were traveling), but when Halle Berry won for "Favorite Female Action Star" at the People's Choice Awards on Tuesday night, she called out to X-Men fans. Here's a good summary of what she said from XMenFilms.net:

    "I had no idea you guys loved Storm so much! Wow, thank you, thank you. And I want to thank Tom Rothman for allowing me to play Storm, and Brett Ratner for allowing Storm to finally use her cape and fly this year." said Halle Berry at yesterday's People's Choice Awards.

    "But I have something to ask you guys. You guys really love X-Men? Ok, here's what you have to do. Write letters. Every one of you in this building who love X-Men and want to see X-Men 4, write a letter to Tom Rothman at Fox and tell him so and you will get another one, and I'll be there too."

    You can write or e-mail 20th Century Fox regarding X4 at:

    20th Century Fox Theatricals

    ATTN: Tom Rothman (X-Men 4)

    P.O. Box 900

    Beverly Hills, CA 90213-0900

    foxmovies@fox.com

    No pressure Tom!

    I take back everything (well some things) I've said or implied about Berry regarding the X-Men franchise. That said, the tone seems to suggest that she enjoyed working under Ratner more than Singer and I'm hardly surprised as Storm had a much bigger role in X3. The fact that X3 wasn't as good as Singer's two installments though....... :happy:

  4. After rumors that the symbiote in "Spider-Man 3" was going to be manufactured during a scientific experiment, Tobey Maguire has confirmed that this won't be the case.

    When talking about the Venom character in an interview with The Los Angeles Times, Tobey said, "He has the same kind of attributes that Spider-Man has, but he's just stronger, faster and more vicious than Spider-Man. And it comes from this goo that comes from outer space, so first the goo comes and gets hold of me."

    Meanwhile in an upcoming article in Premiere Magazine, Harry Osborn is referred to as the "New Goblin" and his glider is called the "Sky Stick". Also director Sam Raimi talked about a potential fourth film, saying "I'm sure they'll keep making Spider-Man pictures. Amy [Pascal, Sony cochairman] told me that she would. I love 'Spider-Man.' And I love working with Kirsten, Tobey, James. I don't know if Thomas and Topher will be around in the next one, but probably Bryce will be".

    What would draw him back? "I have to make sure that when I'm done with this picture I'm really still fascinated with the charater. At the this moment I'm fascinated with him. Whether or not I will be in six month when the movie's done I couldn't say. And I absolutely would not have anything to do with the picture unless I was hungry to tell the story".

    http://www.darkhorizons.com/news06/061215i.php

    So they'll kill Gwen in the fourth movie?

    Given Dunst's reluctance to keep doing them, I'm guessing they'll keep on with Gwen rather than MJ.

  5. Ian, I've never heard you struggle as much as you did in your review of Superman Returns. It's like you wanted to like the film and wanted to deliver kind words about it, but... just couldn't.

    Basically! I don't care too much about Superman and his franchise as much as I do Batman, but I am a fan of Bryan Singer and his work and I really thought he was going to make an ace film. But he didn't.

    Your analysis of the Superman / Lois / Richard / "Superboy" plotline was spot on: Singer (or maybe Warner Bros.) clearly wanted to lay the building blocks for a new Superboy franchise, which totally killed the movie (and possibly future movies) in the process.

    I'm guessing Warner Bros. is to blame for that. They could see that Batman NEEDED a reboot so they weren't about to do a Batman origins film and then cast the youngest Malcom in the Middle boy as Robin. But Superman, for whatever reason, has always had to be a family man (or in Smallville's case, a smouldering teen) for WB writers to be able to do anything with him in the future - see Lois & Clark and this film. Sometimes I wonder why they don't get Paul Dini or one of the DC Animated writers to step up to the movie game because there's so much gold in B:TAS and JL/JLU. They certainly wouldn't strand Lex Luthor on a tiny island or have him drop Krypton crystals in the sea or completely ignore Lois Lane as a hard-nosed journalist.

    I'm glad my very name brings excitement! I should do more long term absences, methinks - it's not like I have any films to review at the moment after all!

  6. Who said Hollywood lacked originality? I mean, Jim Carrey films are so great that their greatness needs to be sequelized in such classics as Son of the Mask, Dumb and Dumberer and now this. I mean, didn't they make a new generation Get Smart with Andy Dick?

    That said, the Bruce Almighty spin-off with Steve Carrell and Morgan Freeman reprising their roles could be good.

  7. This shouldn't surprise me, as "The Hitcher" is one of those under-the-radar films that Hollywood could probably justify remaking. That said, I don't agree with the protagonist being a female - it may be the inner-sexist in me, but I don't enjoy how every horror film has one plucky woman who somehow triumphs over some evil fuck.

    This film will also suffer from having no Rutger Hauer or Jennifer Jason Leigh, one of the most talented actresses there is nowadays. Even C. Thomas Howell was good.

    There's just no need.

  8. Besides, if the Joker kills Dawes, you have insta-heat (excuse the wrestling term) for why Batman has a personal reason to flat out hate the Joker, whilst he didn't flat-out hate Scarecrow or even Ra's.

    Oh man! No! Please, please, please do not turn her into a "woman in a refrigerator." Batman does not need a murdered girlfriend to drive him forward or make him hate The Joker. The simple fact that he cannot stop / contain / figure the man out is enough to make Batman hate him.

    The death of the Waynes is a clean, easy to explain motivation for Bruce's costumed heroics. Compounding that with a dead girlfriend, at the hands of a villain no less, mucks up the simplicity of Batman's core motivation: is he fighting to make sure other children don't suffer the same fate as he, to make sure other men don't lose their lovers, to protect women? See, it becomes too muddy.

    Fair comment. Perhaps I'm just looking for an excuse to kill off Rachel Dawes before she appears in a third sequel!

    (She was never a girlfriend though, given her Batman mask dialogue at the end. Sorry to be a pedant, but I feel that's what my correspondant duty is to do!)

  9. They said everything they needed to say in the first XMen movie about Magneto's origin.

    Mmh. I don't think so. There's so much more, such as how he went from a scrawny kid interned in a concentration camp to the leader of a pro-mutant revolution. What got him from Point A to B? When and how did he meet Xavier? Did he ever have a wife and kids, and where are they now? I'm telling you, a Journeys of Magneto type movie or TV show has loads of potential.

    Bear in mind that in the original X-Men film, Magneto goes from a 9-11 year old boy to a guy who's pushing 60, there's fifty years of mutant activism left unaccounted for (save for his brief appearence in X3 at the home of Jean Grey).

  10. You heard it hear first, she will be fired from this film before the halfway mark of screening. With her about 5th (or lower) on the credits list, there is no way Nolan or the studio is going to put up with any Cruise shit.

    If Dent's getting involved in this film, and he is, don't expect the Dawes character to have a huge impact. After all, with her boss's death in the original film, that either promotes her to DA or Dent is being flown in to take his place. Besides, if the Joker kills Dawes, you have insta-heat (excuse the wrestling term) for why Batman has a personal reason to flat out hate the Joker, whilst he didn't flat-out hate Scarecrow or even Ra's.

    Still, Holmes is a shitty actress.