Cash

Member
  • Posts

    420
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Cash

  1. Also, the gore and outlandish deaths were novel in their day: from Tina being thrown around the room, to Johnny Depp being sucked into the bed and blasted out as buckets of blood.  That shit was nasty (and cool)!

    ------------------------

    (Anyone who doesn't twitch at the site of Phillip becoming Freddy's puppet is hardcore, because that shit still gets me to this day.)

    You're right about that. Ugh, I was actually pretty shocked when they showed the puppet strings. The only thing that I can say is a close rival to setting a precident for deaths is Friday the 13th.

    The one thing that bothers me about the franchise, however, is the humor.  Granted, I still laugh at the jokes and they kept the series alive, but they seem to make Freddy the good guy.  When the audience is laughing with him, they stop caring about the kids he's haunting.  Add to the fact that he's a child molester, and our laughs seem even more out of place.

    I wish they didn't do it too much. Some humor is good, especially when the character is so despicable, but like you said, they tend to overdo it. What I used to tell my friends is that Freddy was the awesomest of the horror villians because not only did he kill you in grotesque ways, he made you laugh while he did it!

  2. Mmm... Three (it was Dream Warriors wasn't it?) was pretty damn entertaining. That's where the humor that I was talking about started to come out (if I'm remembering correctly). This is where voting critieria comes into play. Do you go with what movie you thought was the best, or what entertained you the most?

    Can we just agree that Freddy's Dead wasn't up to snuff?

    I can see you and I really getting into discussions on this stuff Yoda :)

  3. Come on drq, you have to give love to the multiplayer...

    That's one of the things I mentioned in the review; I didn't experience the multiplayer. However, I'm of the belief that multiplayer should be secondary to the single player, especially in a game like that. A great multiplayer mode can enhance a great single player game (such as Halo or Goldeneye) but it can't salvage a horrendous one.

    drq

    Totally with you. That's part of the reason why I have a hard time defending the game... terrible single play.

  4. I'll chime in here with a little experience.  I'm a black belt in karate and we had to choose a weapon to be trained fully in (we learned a little on everything), I chose the sai.  I had to spar with somebody who was trained on kitana blades.  Now, the sai that I was using was only 21 inches long (that includes hilt) whereas the kitana blades are easily 28 inches... just in the blade.  So, if you look at the size comparison alone, I should easliy have got my ass handed to me.  I disarmed him. 

    Conclusion?  It doesn't matter how big the weapon is if you know how to use it.

    Say that to me after I run your ass down in a tank. :P

    Touche mi gordo amigo.

  5. I'll chime in here with a little experience. I'm a black belt in karate and we had to choose a weapon to be trained fully in (we learned a little on everything), I chose the sai. I had to spar with somebody who was trained on kitana blades. Now, the sai that I was using was only 21 inches long (that includes hilt) whereas the kitana blades are easily 28 inches... just in the blade. So, if you look at the size comparison alone, I should easliy have got my ass handed to me. I disarmed him.

    Conclusion? It doesn't matter how big the weapon is if you know how to use it.

  6. I had Contra beaten within three months of getting it, without constant playing.  I didn't beat TMNT until at least six months after I got it, with constant playing.  TMNT gets my vote.

    You probably would have been able to beat TMNT sooner if you were able to use a code similar to Contras. :evil:

    When I said 3 months, I meant that I beat it without the Konami code in three months. With the Konami code... it was done within a day.