Dread

I see what you did there. :happy: <southern belle accent>Why Yoda! Whatevah do you mean?</southern belle accent>

The more I hear about this the more I think that Myers is going to be a crazed hillbilly a la Devil's Rejects.

Thanks Mike. I'll second that. I listen to A LOT of podcasts, and have even met some cool people through them, but none can hold a candle to the community I feel I belong to here on Earth 2. Here's to another several hundred. BTW Mike, when do we hear what's up for episode 200? On 101? I'll be straight as well. My enjoyment and knowledge of anime extends no further than Akira, Blood: the Last Vampire, and the eighties Tomb of Dracula movie. I don't have much interest in the genre but I appreciate the comment. I hope you'll at least listen to the special episodes (on upcoming themed epis and in an upcoming interview with a personality whose talent extends beyond mere horror cinema). I have to get off the internet, there's writing to do and I've got to listen to this damned episode!

Thank you sir! I haven't been able to dl it yet. I'm a few hours away from home as my grandmother passed away yesterday. I'm heading home tomorrow to work on a Reel Dread, a Dread Media and prep a new program for recording Skype for an interview. If you want to read a graphic novel, any graphic novel, whether you like the medium or not, MAUS will move you if you have a soul. Too Cold! Word to your mother, slothian. Word to your mother...

That's the second time this week someone in a messageboard has quoted me in their sigs. I'm becoming prolific...

Then you, sir, are better than half of the people on the internet. Agreed. There are films like the Canadian "Dark Hours" and the Belgian "Calvaire: The Ordeal" that are more along the lines of psychological horror and multi-leveled in theme. They're usually not made in America though. The ones that are just aren't given the time of day by distribution companies. That is the real horror! Seriously? Christ! I thought her symbiotic relationship with Reagan would have killed her soon after he died. When have they ever made a film for critics? That's all a matter of taste really. Again, I enjoyed Hostel but many did not. I enjoyed the first Saw but many did not. I thought Pan's Labyrinth was a bit lacklustre, directionless and devoid of originality when most put it on the best of the year list. But one thing I do know: if Bill O'Reilly hates a film then I'm almost guaranteed to find it entertaining. Iraq should be mentioned a lot. Iraq is something which should be examined in all genre films. For good or bad. Whether it has to be masked as Vietnam or as a zombie apocalypse, it should be at the forefront of everybody's minds. A director I know is in pre-production on a film that has American soldiers doing bad things in Vietnam. I doubt it will be made in this climate (because he refuses to change his vision). That is aggravating to me. It's censorship. That was the point of the column, that without these films the world would be an awful place. I'm not arguing that there should be a film showing the beheading of American soldiers one-by-one just like I don't argue for the cinematic depiction of the torture, rape and murder found in Ulli Lommel's films, I merely used it as an example of why things are being amped up at this time. I hope I'm not avoiding things. If so ask me directly because I'm at work and shouldn't even be doing this but it's too interesting to resist.

3 hours, 16 minutes and 29 seconds...

Slothian, first of all: thanks for the comment. When I started this more than half a year ago I had hoped that it would stimulate discussion and though I haven't got there yet, the very fact that your reaction was this thought out makes me happy. Second of all: I hope my column didn't come through as a ringing recommendation of the new "torture porn" movement (a term I dislike quite a lot). I too don't necessarily dig the extended torture much. However, if used properly it can be most effective (ever seen Marathon Man? You need to). Rob Zombie, while purportedly a fan, just doesn't seem to get it. Like the awful industrial music act of the eighties, Throbbing Gristle, it's all about image and shock more than substance. I fucking loathe to think of Halloween. Zombie should stick to music videos. Period. Though I hate to say it, Hostel wasn't just a good horror film, it was a good overall movie. In essence it is a remake of Deliverance with a little hint of Death Wish thrown in. Eli Roth might be loathesome and mildly retarded but Hostel did what it purported to do. I, for one enjoy being creeped out. I hate a jump scene, I hate a cat popping out of a garbage can, I hate a long-haired pale Japanese chick. I find it a little sad that there is very little follow-through in Hollywood these days. The best the genre has to offer in the past few years is a spoof ("Shaun of the Dead") and a satire ("Behind the Mask: The Rise of Leslie Vernon"). While I may have come up with my next column in that sentence it's a little sad that the best the genre has to offer is the deconstruction of the genre itself. I love both of those films but it is still kind of sad. I agree with you on Hellraiser, as I believe I mentioned in the final installment of Moronic/Iconic, but without the demons these films are nothing more than another sexy girl being hung on a meathook. My point throughout is merely to show a reflection between the screen and reality. The Video Nasty movement of the eighties (to bring it home) was much more the problem of a fucking dictator in office who took free milk away from poor school children than it was the British public. Sorry, but I'd like to see Thatcher exhumed so she could be pissed on. But I digress. My thoughts on the genre are that I much prefer the mystery over the explicit vision. In fact, the first third of Jeepers Creepers is the best horror film ever made. The moment he showed up with the axe, it screwed everything up. I don't really have an ending for this rambling response. I've had a little too much wine and should probably go to bed. So, to conclude, thank you for reading and please: respond more. I love the discourse.

That is, essentially, the premise though right? They're fighting for their jobs. Put that on every catch-up page and boom you're done!

They should have called it "Contest of Champions" since everybody is vying for their positions. That way they can call them The Champions within the context of the book and have a differently titled book to deal with copyright issues a la Shazam/Captain Marvel. I'm going to skip this one and maybe come back for the trade. The Initiative stuff is already clouding my monthly pull list with a lot of Marvel. I need to pare down not keep picking new titles up.

I've made no secret that my ultimate dream-job would be to write a WW2 book that begins with Logan and a few of the European Invaders and continues on to Cap and Bucky joining when the US got involved. Supernazis and uncooperative Communists and a Kamikaze Super Squad from Japan...christ! I'd love to do that.

BKV should be sainted for Y the Last Man. Best comic serial of the decade as far as I'm concerned. Warren Ellis has long been a favourite of mine but he's best when left on his own: pulling the fat out of the fryer for Millar and Bendis (whom together could not write a monthly UFF book) was a great run on UFF. his newuniversal is the best new superhero comic I've read in ages. Nextwave was the best limited series of last year by far. As Planetary coms to a close in the next few months (ie: one issue left but with Cassaday doing AXM too it takes long) I'm awaiting the final chapter on what I think is the best slice of pop culture I may have ever seen. Matt Fraction is doing wonderful stuf on PWJ and I hear Casanova is good too. I should give that trade a try.

On the latest Joe Fridays on Newsarama, JQ mentioned in passing that he has been looking at TC Cap art. I listened to the Pod of Horror (a horror literature podcast) and David Morrell (writer of First Blood, the book the movie is based on) mentioned he's doing a Cap miniseries and he wasn't allowed to mention the artist. Ta-Da!!! David Morrell and Travis Charest on Captain America!

Doom Patrol? On the big screen???? I've been wanting that since before Morrison made them crazy! A TT movie could be cool but it could be so so bad too.

While I like Doom where he is (and find him criminally underused in books other than FF) I would love to see a war between Latveria and Kahndaq

. <----- 52 SPOILER Duh duh DUHHHHHHH!!!!!

What I'd LOVE to see is Silver Surfer's first appearance in DC as a herald of Galactus. I'm writing it right now! Galactus is coming for New Genesis and Apokolips. What side is Silver Surfer on? We'd of course have to get Kirby to draw it! That's in the realm of possibility as far as this thread is concerned...

Cheers! Nightwing would be an awesome Marvel character. Competition/foil for Daredevil would be kind of cool. Especially if Dick Grayson could remain DC as a PI like he was for about a month or two back in the eighties.

Give her a go. Which character do you think would be best suited to switching universes? Personally I'd like to see all the shit Mr. Sinister can stir up in Gotham City.

It was a better story when he died at the end. It was also a better story when he killed all those rangers who were after him. Too bad the screenwriter didn't like Morrell's novel. Amen. Howard's End would have been sooooo much better.

Yeah, I don't know. I watch a lot of shitty movies (I'm a horror fan!) and do my best to find their good qualities. There's always some good (as I mentioned about SM3) but I've only walked out of a film in the theatre once and that was Deep Impact. I did so because my intelligence had never been so ridiculously insulted at the 30 minute mark. SM3 was close. I felt like I'd been slapped in the face. And I only paid $6.50! If I paid full theatre price I would have already mailed Raimi a stool sample. I think I enjoyed the first two films on a visual and script basis. Raimi has never been in my list of favourites, in fact he's quite low. Only Peter Jackson is lower. But the first two were vibrant and had stunning effects (neither of which had much to do with Raimi) and had great stories. They were Spiderman stories. 3 was a "Mask" movie dressed up as Spider-man. Script-wise, the only thing better about the third was the limiting of Aunt May. Thank God for that. I won't be going to see 4 if Raimi's involved. Maybe I'll catch it on cable.

Loved the advice for future homeless listeners! Hysterical. 7/10? Whoa! This one sits below Daredevil for me and only slightly higher than the Captain America movies. Good only for its "so bad it's good" value. Pretty visually but that is all it had to offer me. I really saw this as Raimi saying "fuck you" and showing why he is one of the world's most overrated directors. But I've talked about this at length...so I'll leave it at that.

Check it out if you're interested. The price includes shipping in North America

Uhm...wow!

But controlling and influencing a nation is nothing when there are those who can obliterate that nation with a look.