Game of Thrones


JackFetch
 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 325
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

So, what in the actual fuck was with them deciding to make the sept sex into a rape scene? Was there some damn quota that they hadn't fulfilled? Cersei does not look more sympathetic for having undergone this, and they literally threw all of Jaime's character development out the window for this.

Ugh.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Apparently the director thought that it was consensual by the end and that the whole thing was a turn-on for them, which is completely fucked up. I was going to see if there was any point to what they did, but after reading that and how the scene was in the book, I'm going to go ahead and say the show is permanently damaged.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've been reading two different things - the Salon article making the rounds, and this, where he isn't saying it's consensual and that the show runners were more into it than he was:

www.hollywoodreporter.com/live-feed/game-thrones-director-controversial-scene-697733

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm with Tom, the problem is the book scene starts out rape-y and significantly changes tune. The episode cut out before the change really occurred.

I think Jamie can be redeemed, but it will need to be carefully done. Let's not forget they made Khal Drogo a rapist, too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The problem is, the attempted murder of Brandon should have been Jamie's lowest point, the point that makes his heroic redemption all the more impressive. Whereas the reunion with Cersei was meant to be a stumbling block on his heroic journey, and it's almost turned back into another Moral Event Horizon.

That and Bran is just... awful.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It seems that a lot of the upset is not that there was a rape in and of itself (although some of that is there as well), but that it deviated from the book. Sometimes in an adaptation changes are made (and that all by itself will cause consternation), but it appears to me that taking a scene which read as either consensual or as "it became consensual at some point" (which is problematic all by its lonesome) appeared on screen to have been changed to a violent act against a woman for no real reason other than shock or tittilation (although there was NOTHING tittilating about that scene).

Brother-sister bumping of uglies in a church under the body of their dead incest baby not being shocking enough, mind.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And I get that Brienne is the honorable, virginal knightess and Cersei is the hateful bitch who uses sex as the most effective weapon in the series, but rape is still rape. There are characters that could, should and will perform more sexual violence in the upcoming seasons. The new and improved Jamie Lannister is not one of them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And I get that Brienne is the honorable, virginal knightess and Cersei is the hateful bitch who uses sex as the most effective weapon in the series, but rape is still rape. There are characters that could, should and will perform more sexual violence in the upcoming seasons. The new and improved Jamie Lannister is not one of them.

I understand where you're coming from, but you're looking at this from the perspective of someone who's read the books. I would argue most viewers haven't and this is a thing on its own. I love that one of the best people in this world is a rapist and murderer. Even Arya takes great sadistic joy in killing when she does.

Game of Thrones is nihilistic and misanthropic. I love that it is so popular.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm more bothered by the derailment of the best character arc on the series.

Jamie went to all that effort to keep Brienne from getting raped last season and then rapes Cersei? There's my fucking issue.

real life does not have neat story and character arks that go from A to Z. So why should a TV show have them. Is playing with the conventions of what people expect from a show not a good thing?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not to outright defend it but remember that in the novels, Jamie is just getting back when The Purple Wedding occurs. Now, he's had weeks to be rejected by Cersei and see the extent of how she's changed. Not only that but Cersei has been able to adjust to the new Jamie. It might be a narrative mistake but it's not outright character derailment.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.